Kerajaan telah merompak kita melalui bermacam cara. Kita tidak nampak dan faham bahawa kita telah di rompak.
Contoh nya :-
1) AP kereta.
Untok membawa masuk/mengi mport kereta kadalam Malaysia setiap kereta di kenakan
1.1) cukai import
1.2) keuntongan penjual kereta.
Harga kereta yang di import akan jadi berganda kerana membayar lesen AP. Dan kerajaan tiada untong. Kita menguntongkan kroni2 kerajaan sahaja. Penjual kereta sebenarnya telah bersubahat dengan kerajaan apabila setuju dengan bayaran AP kerta.
Jadi adalah penting kita HARTAL/BOIKOT KERETA BER "AP"
2) Beras dan makanan.
Bernas Sdn merupakan monopoly untok beras. Mereka telah rompak rakyat dengan harga beras yang melambung tinggi. Mereka juga di beritakan smuggle beras juga.
Jadi adalah penting kita HARTAL/BOIKOT BERNAS
Jalan yang baik ia lah beli beras pada penanam beras terus, Tanam padi sendiri, makan roti cepati.
Jika dulu kita pandai tanam makanan sendiri, kenapa sekarang kita tidak pandai tanam makanan sendiri???
Adakah Education kerajaan telah membodohkan kita supaya tidak pandai tanam makanan sendiri???
Dulu kita kaya...anak berdozen... makanan mewah !!!
Kini kerana duit kertas kita beranak dua tiga, kerana makan tak cukup.
Adakah Education kerajaan telah membodohkan kita supaya tidak kaya macam dulu ???
3) Rumah.
Harga rumah melambung kerana
3.1) Duit kertas jatuh nilai kerana kerajaan berhutang dan kita membayar hutang kerajaan melalui inflasi/jatuhnya nilai ringgit.
3.2)Apa bila inflasi berlaku barang2 bina rumah naik harga dan kita di rompak oleh penjual barangan2 bina rumah.
3.3)Contractor Rumah rompak pembeli rumah apabila barangan naik harga. Mereka juga turut naikkan harga.
3.4) Oleh kerana harga rumah terlampau mahal, maka kita terpaksa pinjam duit daripada Bank. Harga rumah menjadi 100% lebeh mahal kerana kita terpaksa bayar riba atas pinjaman kita. Kita turut berdosa apabila kita bayar riba kapada Bank.
Jadi ada lah penting kita HARTAL/BOIKOT BELI RUMAH CARA RIBA.
Jika dahulu kita boleh bina rumah sendiri, kenapa kita tidak boleh bina rumah sendiri masa kini.???
Para setengan boleh bina rumah sendiri, kenapa kita tidak boleh bina rumah sendiri???
Education kerajaan telah buat kita bodoh, sebab tak pandai buat rumah sendiri.!!!
Kita boleh guna cara gotong royong buat rumah sendiri. Kita HARTAL/BOIKOT BANK DAN PENCETAK DUIT KERTAS PENIPUAN apabila kita buat rumah sendiri.
Fikir2 lah wahai anak cucu ku.
Ekonomi Islam telah di lupai. !!!
Ekonomi Kafir telah menjajah kita !!!
Mari kita Revolusi untok kembalikan ekonomi Islam tanpa riba dan tamak !!!.
bersambung lagi...
Tuesday, July 28, 2009
Saturday, July 25, 2009
"Cawat" bogelkan Presiden PAS.
Presiden PAS di lihat "terbogel" akibat "meludah di langit", "memasukkan kaki dalam mulut".
Setelah memperlekehkan diri sendiri dengan kenyataan Unity Gomen, Presiden PAS kembali dengan keangkuhan, biadap mulut, dan perangai un-Islamiknya, apabila penduduk Batang Ai, Sarawak di hina dengan kenyataan seperti berikut....
"Semua pilihanraya kecil sebelum ini keputusannya memihak kapada kita. Cuma di Batang Ai sahaja kita kalah sebab mereka ini tidak reti undi, pakai cawat lagi. Saya bukan nak hina, tetapi tempat yang pakai molek undi PAS."
Bertapa sombong dan bodohnya Presiden PAS ini. Adakah Presiden PAS ini buta ??? ataupun nyanyuk ???
Keadaan pakai cawat tidak bermaana tak pandai undi !!!
Saya pun pakai cawat juga,tapi saya tau siapa patut di undi, dan saya tahu yang presiden PAS berbohong.
Contoh... Orang Trengganu (tempat asal Presiden PAS), pakai molek,...tetapi mereka undi UMNO juga. Apakah orang2 Trengganu tak reti undi ??? Sehingga majority 2/3 undi UMNO dan tolak PAS???
Nota : Orang Batang Ai macam orang Trengganu juga.Mereka pakai lebeh molek dari jubah Abd. Hadi yang bau busok tu.
Oleh kerana miskin undi mereka boleh di beli. BN memang selalu beli undi. Tipu undi, undi pos dan undi hantu pun menolong BN menang juga.
Tiada beza orang2 apahalnya sampai kamu nak menghina beliau begituSarawak yang pro BN dengan orang2 macam Abd. Hadi dari Trengganu, yang boleh di beli dengan Unity Gomen dan bermacam project pembangunan.
Woi orang2 PAS!!! Kamu punya Presiden sunggoh bodoh sombong !!!
Jika mahukan undi kami, kenapa kami di hina pula ???
Bodoh betul Presiden PAS ini !!!
Tolong cepat2 gantikan dengan orang yang bijak,.. yang pandai Matematik dan Sains,.. bukan Ulama yang kesemuanya tercorot dan gagal dalam matapelajaran Matematik dan Sains.
Lagi pun kepala bersarban di Malaysia selalu overheat/kepanasan dan otak mereka cair dan meleleh melalui hidung, telingga dan mulut mereka. Ini membuat mereka tidak mampu berfikir sebab otak dah kosong, kerana keluar kat hidung,telingga dan mulut.
Malaun punya PAS !!! Presiden buta pun boleh pimpin mereka. Tunggulpun boleh jadi Presiden PAS.!!!
Setelah memperlekehkan diri sendiri dengan kenyataan Unity Gomen, Presiden PAS kembali dengan keangkuhan, biadap mulut, dan perangai un-Islamiknya, apabila penduduk Batang Ai, Sarawak di hina dengan kenyataan seperti berikut....
"Semua pilihanraya kecil sebelum ini keputusannya memihak kapada kita. Cuma di Batang Ai sahaja kita kalah sebab mereka ini tidak reti undi, pakai cawat lagi. Saya bukan nak hina, tetapi tempat yang pakai molek undi PAS."
Bertapa sombong dan bodohnya Presiden PAS ini. Adakah Presiden PAS ini buta ??? ataupun nyanyuk ???
Keadaan pakai cawat tidak bermaana tak pandai undi !!!
Saya pun pakai cawat juga,tapi saya tau siapa patut di undi, dan saya tahu yang presiden PAS berbohong.
Contoh... Orang Trengganu (tempat asal Presiden PAS), pakai molek,...tetapi mereka undi UMNO juga. Apakah orang2 Trengganu tak reti undi ??? Sehingga majority 2/3 undi UMNO dan tolak PAS???
Nota : Orang Batang Ai macam orang Trengganu juga.Mereka pakai lebeh molek dari jubah Abd. Hadi yang bau busok tu.
Oleh kerana miskin undi mereka boleh di beli. BN memang selalu beli undi. Tipu undi, undi pos dan undi hantu pun menolong BN menang juga.
Tiada beza orang2 apahalnya sampai kamu nak menghina beliau begituSarawak yang pro BN dengan orang2 macam Abd. Hadi dari Trengganu, yang boleh di beli dengan Unity Gomen dan bermacam project pembangunan.
Woi orang2 PAS!!! Kamu punya Presiden sunggoh bodoh sombong !!!
Jika mahukan undi kami, kenapa kami di hina pula ???
Bodoh betul Presiden PAS ini !!!
Tolong cepat2 gantikan dengan orang yang bijak,.. yang pandai Matematik dan Sains,.. bukan Ulama yang kesemuanya tercorot dan gagal dalam matapelajaran Matematik dan Sains.
Lagi pun kepala bersarban di Malaysia selalu overheat/kepanasan dan otak mereka cair dan meleleh melalui hidung, telingga dan mulut mereka. Ini membuat mereka tidak mampu berfikir sebab otak dah kosong, kerana keluar kat hidung,telingga dan mulut.
Malaun punya PAS !!! Presiden buta pun boleh pimpin mereka. Tunggulpun boleh jadi Presiden PAS.!!!
Wednesday, July 22, 2009
Politik Liwat punca kematian Teoh ?
Apakah maananya politik Liwat ?
Politik liwat maananya "membunoh pembangkang dengan fitnah".
Pengasas/Bapak Politik Liwat adalah Dr M. Beliau telah tudoh atau fitnah A..I. tanpa 4 saksi yang di kehendaki oleh Perundangan Islam. Cuma "Mahkamah Lingam" yang kafir/bukan Islam sahaja yang membolehkan benda yang tak boleh di buat. Ini lah ajaibnya concept "Malaysia Boleh", juga ciptaan Dr M dan Amno.
Kini pengamal "Politik Liwat" dan "Mahathiefism" (pengikut Dr M) yang setia dan taksub daripada kalang Amno, sedang menggubah satu sandiwara fitnah/Politik Liwat yang boleh menjatuhkan kerajaan pembangkang mereka.
Sebuah negara bernama Berak Lalulisan telah di jatuhkan dengan cara Politik Liwat dan Mahathiefism. Fitnah dan klingtong(kata2 Dr M), telah di hidupkan semula demi semangat Politik Liwat dan Mahathiefism yang ada persamaan dengan politik Machievelli seorang Christian murtad yang mengajar keutamaan kegunaan tipu helah(klingtong, yang menjadi kegemaran Dr M).
Antara strategy lain yang di gunakan adalah
1) Menuduh/Fitnah A. I kali ke 2 meliwat si-Saifool . Perkara ini berlaku setelah si Saifool berjumpa Nahjaib se-orang Crime Minister yang di katakan terbabit dengan pembunohan Alhantuya.
2) Mencari saksi dan pemfitnah untok memfitnah kerajaan pembangkang ataupun wakil pembangkang. Saksi dan pemfitnah ini perlu pandai klingtong(kepala otak macam Dr M) dan ada quality seperti Azizan (driver Anwar) dan Saiful Sodomy2.
3) Menipu melalui SPR ,undi pos dan undi hantu.
4)Menguna ISA, OSA, Sedition Act, Mahkamah Lingam, Police Mafia dan cara 2 yang di kutuk Allah.
Politik Liwat dan Mahathiefism dan Kafirnomics yang menyebabkan huru hara kemiskinan dan kematian2 yang telah berlaku, di lakukan oleh kerajaan /kakitangan "lembaga" kerajaan seperti nama berikut, perlu di hapuskan :-
A Kugan, Samiyati Zulkarnain Putra, Francis Udayappan, Dr Tai Eng Teck (the police officer was eventually convicted), V Vikines, Tharma Rajan, M Ragupathy, Syed Fadzil Syed Ibrahim, Hasrizal Hamzah, Prakash Moses, Kannan Kanthan, Ahmad Salleh, Ulaganathan Muniandy, Vivashanu Pilai, Ho Kwai See, Ravichandran Ramayah, Veerasamy Gopal, L. Yoges Rao,Adi Anwar, Teoh B H, insiden Memali dan sebagainya.
Justru itu, kita perlukan "Satu Revolusi" sepertimana negara2 maju dan pandai telah lakukan.
Democracy telah mati di Politik Liwatkan dan di Mahathiefismkan dan di Kafirnomikkan oleh Amno/Bn.
Hidup Revolusi Malaysia dan Dunia !!!
Satu Revolusi !!!
Politik liwat maananya "membunoh pembangkang dengan fitnah".
Pengasas/Bapak Politik Liwat adalah Dr M. Beliau telah tudoh atau fitnah A..I. tanpa 4 saksi yang di kehendaki oleh Perundangan Islam. Cuma "Mahkamah Lingam" yang kafir/bukan Islam sahaja yang membolehkan benda yang tak boleh di buat. Ini lah ajaibnya concept "Malaysia Boleh", juga ciptaan Dr M dan Amno.
Kini pengamal "Politik Liwat" dan "Mahathiefism" (pengikut Dr M) yang setia dan taksub daripada kalang Amno, sedang menggubah satu sandiwara fitnah/Politik Liwat yang boleh menjatuhkan kerajaan pembangkang mereka.
Sebuah negara bernama Berak Lalulisan telah di jatuhkan dengan cara Politik Liwat dan Mahathiefism. Fitnah dan klingtong(kata2 Dr M), telah di hidupkan semula demi semangat Politik Liwat dan Mahathiefism yang ada persamaan dengan politik Machievelli seorang Christian murtad yang mengajar keutamaan kegunaan tipu helah(klingtong, yang menjadi kegemaran Dr M).
Antara strategy lain yang di gunakan adalah
1) Menuduh/Fitnah A. I kali ke 2 meliwat si-Saifool . Perkara ini berlaku setelah si Saifool berjumpa Nahjaib se-orang Crime Minister yang di katakan terbabit dengan pembunohan Alhantuya.
2) Mencari saksi dan pemfitnah untok memfitnah kerajaan pembangkang ataupun wakil pembangkang. Saksi dan pemfitnah ini perlu pandai klingtong(kepala otak macam Dr M) dan ada quality seperti Azizan (driver Anwar) dan Saiful Sodomy2.
3) Menipu melalui SPR ,undi pos dan undi hantu.
4)Menguna ISA, OSA, Sedition Act, Mahkamah Lingam, Police Mafia dan cara 2 yang di kutuk Allah.
Politik Liwat dan Mahathiefism dan Kafirnomics yang menyebabkan huru hara kemiskinan dan kematian2 yang telah berlaku, di lakukan oleh kerajaan /kakitangan "lembaga" kerajaan seperti nama berikut, perlu di hapuskan :-
A Kugan, Samiyati Zulkarnain Putra, Francis Udayappan, Dr Tai Eng Teck (the police officer was eventually convicted), V Vikines, Tharma Rajan, M Ragupathy, Syed Fadzil Syed Ibrahim, Hasrizal Hamzah, Prakash Moses, Kannan Kanthan, Ahmad Salleh, Ulaganathan Muniandy, Vivashanu Pilai, Ho Kwai See, Ravichandran Ramayah, Veerasamy Gopal, L. Yoges Rao,Adi Anwar, Teoh B H, insiden Memali dan sebagainya.
Justru itu, kita perlukan "Satu Revolusi" sepertimana negara2 maju dan pandai telah lakukan.
Democracy telah mati di Politik Liwatkan dan di Mahathiefismkan dan di Kafirnomikkan oleh Amno/Bn.
Hidup Revolusi Malaysia dan Dunia !!!
Satu Revolusi !!!
Tuesday, July 21, 2009
KeTuanan Melayu/KeTuanan Cina/KeTuanan Zionist
Are we discussing about culture, economics or politics here.???
a)If culture, the solution is ...when in Rome do as the Romans do. When in Malaysia do as the Malays do.
b)If economics...the the race with the most amount of money is the Tuan.
c)If politics then it is a combination of both.
However lets debate the Ketuanan Melayu as this is the issue often debated.
1)Ketuanan Melayu is non existent if money is in the hands of non Malays.
This is the haqiqah of the matter.
HE WHO HAS MORE WEALTH IS THE TUAN.
With GLOBALISATION and LIBRALISATION adopted a whole new game is in place.
In terms of wealth...
1.1) Is the Malays,Chinese or Zionist the Tuan ???
1.2) Who is the real paper money maker ???
1.3) Who is the real Tuan in Malaysia and the whole world ???
If economics is the system of measuring who is Tuan, the restruturing via the NEP is no wrong. However it would be better to deracialise it by having a Socialist or a CLASSLESS economics. Political problems have a rootcause in economics, because economics is the porpose of politics.
2)The British made Chinese equal partners in bussiness industries.
Therefore, the Chinese are the real "Tuan" because they are the rich/elite class.
They were even given the first Bank in Sarawak to their advantage.
2.1)By doing so the Chinese are the TUAN.
Whoever has the ability to make money out of no money(paper) is the Tuan. But the machine to make paper money is with the British/Zionist.
2.3)Therefore the real TUAN is the British/Zionist.
Hence, the KeTuanan Melayu is only a British/Zionist gimmick.
The Malay Sultans were "PUPPET TUANS" with a salary to easy the exploitation of the countries wealth.
Democracy was a new game to put the Malays and the Chines at each others throats and survival of the richest. It was a classic divide and rule formula.
This is the HAQIQAH/ABSOLUTE TRUTH of Pak Yeh. Others views are like looking at things from vielled/miopic eyes.
a)If culture, the solution is ...when in Rome do as the Romans do. When in Malaysia do as the Malays do.
b)If economics...the the race with the most amount of money is the Tuan.
c)If politics then it is a combination of both.
However lets debate the Ketuanan Melayu as this is the issue often debated.
1)Ketuanan Melayu is non existent if money is in the hands of non Malays.
This is the haqiqah of the matter.
HE WHO HAS MORE WEALTH IS THE TUAN.
With GLOBALISATION and LIBRALISATION adopted a whole new game is in place.
In terms of wealth...
1.1) Is the Malays,Chinese or Zionist the Tuan ???
1.2) Who is the real paper money maker ???
1.3) Who is the real Tuan in Malaysia and the whole world ???
If economics is the system of measuring who is Tuan, the restruturing via the NEP is no wrong. However it would be better to deracialise it by having a Socialist or a CLASSLESS economics. Political problems have a rootcause in economics, because economics is the porpose of politics.
2)The British made Chinese equal partners in bussiness industries.
Therefore, the Chinese are the real "Tuan" because they are the rich/elite class.
They were even given the first Bank in Sarawak to their advantage.
2.1)By doing so the Chinese are the TUAN.
Whoever has the ability to make money out of no money(paper) is the Tuan. But the machine to make paper money is with the British/Zionist.
2.3)Therefore the real TUAN is the British/Zionist.
Hence, the KeTuanan Melayu is only a British/Zionist gimmick.
The Malay Sultans were "PUPPET TUANS" with a salary to easy the exploitation of the countries wealth.
Democracy was a new game to put the Malays and the Chines at each others throats and survival of the richest. It was a classic divide and rule formula.
This is the HAQIQAH/ABSOLUTE TRUTH of Pak Yeh. Others views are like looking at things from vielled/miopic eyes.
Monday, July 13, 2009
Revolution pt 3 : The Way of Gandhi and Jesus.
What's the best formula for a revolution?
Lets define what a revolution is through a linguistic method, a third party method which is unbiased towards any particular method.
Revolution is a word. A word has no meaning. People put meaning to the word. Some say revolution is Karl Marx, Prophet Muhammad, Thomas Pain, Gandhi, Mao Tse Tung, etcetera, etcetera. So to make it unbaised lets rojak it together and bring out the best of every idea.
First let us discuss the Gandhi/Jesus Way.
Though Jesus was not able to create a physical revolution, he was able to create a mental revolution. The way of non violence and love instead of violence and hatred as taught by Jesus was practiced and sucessfully made into a revolution by Gandhi.
By modern standards, we do not subscribe to violence and destructive methods of Revolution.
The quotations below more or less summarises the way of Jesus and Gandhi.
1) Non violence.
Gandhi said :
An eye for and eye makes everybody blind.
Pak Yeh says :
With weapons of mass detruction we would all end up dead. Those that survive would have to migrate to another planet.
2)Destroy the ideology, not the person.
Gandhi said :
By the non-violent method we seek to destroy not the capitalist. We seek to destroy capitalism. We must not aim at his destruction. We must strive for his conversion.
3) Non-Cooperation/Pasive Resistance.
Gandhi said :
Non-cooperation with evil is as much a divine duty as co-operation with good.
4) A Classless Society.
Gandhi said :
Socialism is a beautiful word and so far as I am aware in socialism all the members of society are equal - none low, none high. In the individual body, the head is not high because it is the top of the body, nor are the soles of the feet low, because they touch the earth. Even as members of the individual body are equal, so are the members of society. That is socialism. This socialism is as pure as crystal. It, therefore, requires crystal-like means to achieve it.
5)Equal Distribution of Wealth, for needs,not greed.
Gandhi said :
The real implication of equal distribution is that each man shall have the wherewithal to supply all his natural needs and no more. To bring this ideal into being the entire social order has got to be reconstructed, as we progress towards our goal, we shall find contentment and happiness, and to that extent too shall we have contributed towards the bringing into being of a non-violent society.
The earth provides enough for everyone's needs, but not enough for everyone's greed.
6) On Independence.
Gandhi said :
One has to be self-reliant in everything. If people do not start working of their own free will, time and circumstances will make them do so.
Mark Kinney said :
Money has become a ring we wear through the nose, which allows us to be lead by those who control it.
Gandhi said :
Every human being has a right to love and therefore to find the wherewithal to feed himself and where necessary to clothe and house himself. But, for this very simple performance, we need no assistance from economists or their laws.
Pak Yeh says : In the past we don't need money to feed and house ourselves. Mankind have lost their original God given independence, to be enslaved by paper money,the Bankers and Creators of paper money.
7) Our Mission.
Gandhi said :
The individual, being pure, sacrifices himself for the family, the latter for the village, the village for the district, the district for the province, the province for the nation, the nation for all.
You must be the change, you want the world to be.
Lets define what a revolution is through a linguistic method, a third party method which is unbiased towards any particular method.
Revolution is a word. A word has no meaning. People put meaning to the word. Some say revolution is Karl Marx, Prophet Muhammad, Thomas Pain, Gandhi, Mao Tse Tung, etcetera, etcetera. So to make it unbaised lets rojak it together and bring out the best of every idea.
First let us discuss the Gandhi/Jesus Way.
Though Jesus was not able to create a physical revolution, he was able to create a mental revolution. The way of non violence and love instead of violence and hatred as taught by Jesus was practiced and sucessfully made into a revolution by Gandhi.
By modern standards, we do not subscribe to violence and destructive methods of Revolution.
The quotations below more or less summarises the way of Jesus and Gandhi.
1) Non violence.
Gandhi said :
An eye for and eye makes everybody blind.
Pak Yeh says :
With weapons of mass detruction we would all end up dead. Those that survive would have to migrate to another planet.
2)Destroy the ideology, not the person.
Gandhi said :
By the non-violent method we seek to destroy not the capitalist. We seek to destroy capitalism. We must not aim at his destruction. We must strive for his conversion.
3) Non-Cooperation/Pasive Resistance.
Gandhi said :
Non-cooperation with evil is as much a divine duty as co-operation with good.
4) A Classless Society.
Gandhi said :
Socialism is a beautiful word and so far as I am aware in socialism all the members of society are equal - none low, none high. In the individual body, the head is not high because it is the top of the body, nor are the soles of the feet low, because they touch the earth. Even as members of the individual body are equal, so are the members of society. That is socialism. This socialism is as pure as crystal. It, therefore, requires crystal-like means to achieve it.
5)Equal Distribution of Wealth, for needs,not greed.
Gandhi said :
The real implication of equal distribution is that each man shall have the wherewithal to supply all his natural needs and no more. To bring this ideal into being the entire social order has got to be reconstructed, as we progress towards our goal, we shall find contentment and happiness, and to that extent too shall we have contributed towards the bringing into being of a non-violent society.
The earth provides enough for everyone's needs, but not enough for everyone's greed.
6) On Independence.
Gandhi said :
One has to be self-reliant in everything. If people do not start working of their own free will, time and circumstances will make them do so.
Mark Kinney said :
Money has become a ring we wear through the nose, which allows us to be lead by those who control it.
Gandhi said :
Every human being has a right to love and therefore to find the wherewithal to feed himself and where necessary to clothe and house himself. But, for this very simple performance, we need no assistance from economists or their laws.
Pak Yeh says : In the past we don't need money to feed and house ourselves. Mankind have lost their original God given independence, to be enslaved by paper money,the Bankers and Creators of paper money.
7) Our Mission.
Gandhi said :
The individual, being pure, sacrifices himself for the family, the latter for the village, the village for the district, the district for the province, the province for the nation, the nation for all.
You must be the change, you want the world to be.
Tuesday, July 7, 2009
Revolution pt2 : Reject Kafirnomics
USURY The Instrument Of World Enslavement
The End Of Economics
from PAID Newsletter, Norwich England, 1989
Define, don't be defined
Before tackling the topic of usury, i.e. interest debt and zero worth money, we must put it in context. Most importantly, we want to place it in a context that is of our own defining. This is of fundamental importance, because the dominant place of the userers has enabled them - through their high-tech network of money, markets and media - to impose their definitions upon the rest of humankind. We think of the problem, and the solution in predefined terms that are not of our own choosing. If we continue to remain within their sphere of meaning we will be trapped, unable to make any changes. The first steps that must be taken towards change and freedom are steps of defining.
If we view the phenomenon of usury from a historical perspective, in a long shot, so to speak, we can see that it has been limited and forbidden by every civilisation that valued the higher human qualities, such as trust, justice, the pursuit of knowledge and the spiritual encounter with the Divine.
As is clearly documented in the book, Usury: The Root Cause Of Injustice Of Our Times, the legalisation of usury in Europe a mere 300 years ago has permitted the dominance of a new breed of middlemen. They have conquered the zone of the transaction, totally to the extent that now all of us are forced to buy and sell in their markets, on their terms, using their banks, their money, and their technology. Opting out is simply not permitted.
The development of centralised banking networks and the creation of money, both began and remain today, firmly in the hands of private, non-government, non-elected groups of individuals. The Bank of England, despite the implications of its name, is not run by the government. The Federal Reserve Board, a governmentish sounding name if ever there was one, is not under the control of the US government. Quite the opposite.
The nation state have relinquished power to the supra-national monetarist elite, who now, almost overtly, dictate domestic policy. The nation state has become a control-zone within which a particular type of ID card and a particular paper money must be used. They have no power of their own. Their leaders are recruited and trained by the monetarists to carry out their policies, under the camouflage of the democratic process. Opposition to monetarist policy is seen as a head-on confrontation with the state, and is either absorbed into the pro/anti dialectical framework or it is discreetly removed. The dialectic is the defense mechanism of the userers, and the democratic process their trojan horse.
Britain is a classic example. Mrs. Thatcher, in true corporate raider style, has stripped the assets of the nation and sold them to the highest bidder, but who benefits? Certainly not the average citizen who is struggling for survival under the burden of ever-increasing debt. When Mr. Lawson, now no doubt destined for even greater things within the corporate sector, when he said recently that no one was happy to see higher interest rates, he ommited to add 'except the money-lenders.'
Once all business have to compete with the price of money, and the gravitational pull towards gigantism, it is inevitable that the small family business has llittle or no chance of survival. Short people drown first in a rising tide. The individual, alone with his own debts and anxieties, facing the might of corporate power, is unlikely to dare to step out of line.
When Mr. Sid Average comes back from the bank, happy that he too is now an stock-owner, and he can share in the wealth of this great nation, he is unlikely to be aware that, comes tomorrow or the day after, his bank, his mortgage company, his employer, his gas, his electricity and water suppliers, the newspaper and TV companies may all be controlled by the same group of people. It is not a conspiracy, it is just the way it is. Once a corporation is on the open market, where all are free to compete equally and the highest bidder wins, the winner is likely to be the one with the biggest bank roll. If one group is allowed to print money at will, and lend it at interest, they are likely to have the biggest roll. Lives are bought and sold in our free society.
We now find ourselves completely absorbed into the technological project, which has become the dominant global activity. Everything becomes an available resource to be used to further the project. Sustaining the economic structure becomes of paramount importance, as if everything and everyone depends on it for their survival. Everything is judged in terms of efficiency and cost-effectiveness, if you cannot measure it or add it up, then forget it. Quality itself has no value, unless it means you can charge more because of it.
And what about our humanity, and those things that give our lives meaning? Once we are subsumed under the dominant technological project, we become just another available resource. We are redefined. We are consumers, borrowers, mortgage payers (incorrectly called house owners), components of a market sector, just another part of the production and consumption process.
If we are serious about making changes, then we must look deeply into the causes of our predicament, and be prepared to act in accordance with what we find, for the current status quo is fuelled by our passivity.
Somewhere along the way we have relinquished responsibility for our own lives, for our being here. If we do not take our lives into our own hands, then we will have no one to blame but ourselves.
Hijacked Belief
And so what shall we do, and where do we begin?
If we consider medical analogy at this point it may shed some light on our situation. Imagine someone with a complicated array of physical symptoms that refuse to respond to treatment, and continually deteriorate.
Rather than opting for more surgery and wonder drugs, one may find that on close inspection this person follows a set of behaviour patterns that are clearly aggravating, or even causing the problem. He may live on a diet of junk food, alcohol and cigarettes. He may take no exercise and spend two hours each day driving in rush hour traffic. He may well be so short of vital nutrients and so full of toxin that his body cannot be other than a manifestation of that imbalance. On top of all this he may be in the middle of a breakdown of his marriage, and have a job that he hates but dares not quit.
Delving deeper, we may find that he is not in any way believe that his actions are of any consequence, so why should he change. He does not much like himself or his wife, so why bother.
Clearly, until this person changes his behaviour, his health will not improve, and until he changes his attitude and his basic beliefs, he will not be capable of changing his behaviour.
We can see that the events that surrounded the legislation of usury in England in the late 17th century were actually a manifestation of a shift in people's basic beliefs. The generally accepted definitions of human being, and his place and function in existence went through fundamental changes that are still current today, and indeed underpin every aspect of modern life.
If you dissolve the universal contract between the Creator and the created, and declare man the master of the universe, you open the door to all manner of corruption and imbalance. Man's inner being and his higher nature are then denied any reality, and will in any case be smothered in the scramble to get what you can, fuelled by the underlying anxiety out there, get a job, make some money. BE somebody.
While no one is suggesting that we go back to the worldview of 17th century England, we would do well to listen to the voices who warned of what was to come. Throughout the following decades and centuries, we can consistently hear voices warning that if we do not change our
fundamental ideas about what life is all abouit, we will be heading for disaster - in this world, never mind the next.
Belief, that most fundamental of all human qualities, was hijacked, and deflected onto the fantasy wealth, and as it settled on the unkept paper promises, it gave reality and value to illusion. And so of course the illusion worked. Everyone believed it.
In The Ten Symphonies of Gorka Konig by Ian Dallas, one of the characters says, 'As long as you think money is real, you will be an obedient slave. Once you grasp that it is worthless you recognise poverty in the fantasy money system, and at the same time real wealth in the world's natural resources, the greatest of which is man and woman.'
We must re-evaluate our possibilities and realise our potential.
In practical terms this means, quite simply, meeting, studying, discussing, de-programming, encouraging one another to fulfill our highest possibilities, for this is the antidote to the drugged sleepwalk that passes for modern life. Above all it means believing that we can and do make a difference.
The Power of the Butterfly
Reductionist scientific thinking has attempted to shrink life into a set of linear equations and cashflow charts. Thankfully life is NOT linear, so it cannot be done, and while their experiments may work on paper and on the screen, you get a different set of results when things are played out in real life. Hence that current disaster scenario.
Rational scientific thinking has actually brought itself out of a job, because, forced to accept that life is a nonlinear event, and attempting to express probabilities in nonlinear equations, they have found that nothing can actually be predicted at all, except perhaps the limits of prediction. An expression of this is the statement by the proponents of the Chaos theory that a butterfly fluttering its wings on one side of the earth could cause a hurricane on the other.
So we do not know what effect we are having by our apparently insignificant meetings and publications. We cannot measure it. What has been clearly shown is that the outcome of an event is affected by the aspirations of the participants. We must believe that success is ours for the taking. Why should it not be?
We are confronting people whose weakness is the very thing that they believe gives them power. They think that they are in charge of existence, that they can conquer it, tame it, and make profit out of it.
They do not believe that they will ever face a reckoning for their actions. And they are wrong.
This is usurious thinking, for this attitude causes the build-up of an ever-increasing debt that like toxic waste, does not just disappear simply because you bury it, or export it, or ignore it. The accumulated debts of injustice are waiting to be collected.
And like a counter balance, the world is waiting for people who are prepared to fulfill their truly human potential as guardians of the earth and its inhabitants, of life itself, people who uphold the right and forbid the wrong. This is not achieved by direct opposition to usurious system and its masters, for they are strengthened by opposition. It gives them a reality. Like the classic piece of sixties graffiti said, 'Don't vote, it only encourages them.' Their fantasy strength is reinforced by opposition to it. Like the phantom in a nightmare, it will only vanish if it is ignored. The more you attack it, the bigger it gets.
This tyrannical system will be over come by people who turn away from it - not by dropping out - but by declaring it a fantasy, and saying, with certainty, 'That is false, Reality is with us.' The capacity of people to transform themselves and their lives is the very thing that will conquer. If we refuse to be owned slaves, then we must be different Affirm the real, for when the REAL comes, the false must vanish.
People who are bound together with the true human companionship that comes from undertaking a journey or a task or a commitment that, even though it might appear too awesome to bear, is in fact the only available option - these people carry with them the seed of life that is unstoppable.
To do otherwise is to resign oneself to a life of unfulfilled potential and to being at best, mediocre. The more we meet, and discuss, and learn from each other, and share life, celebrate life, the more our members will grow and possibilities will open up, possibilities that we cannot know of or imagine, until we take the step.
I can do no better than to end with the words of Goethe, that visionary poet, opponent of usury and protector of humanity.
'Until there is commitment, there is hesistancy, the chance to draw back, always ineffectiveness. Concerning all acts of initiative and creation, there is one elementary truth the ignorance of which kills countless ideas and splendid plans: that the moment one commits oneself, the Providence moves too. All sorts of things occur to help one that would never otherwise have occured. A whole stream of events issues forth from the decision, raising in one's favour all manner of unforseen incidents and meetings and material assistance which no man could have dreamed would have come his way.'
'Whatever you can do, or dream you can do, begin it. Boldness has genius, power and magic in it. Begin it now.'
This is not an economic issue, it is a human one.
PAID - People Against Interest-Debt
MALAYSIA
PAID Network
120 Armenian Street
10200 Penang
Fax: 604 - 228 2487
The End Of Economics
from PAID Newsletter, Norwich England, 1989
Define, don't be defined
Before tackling the topic of usury, i.e. interest debt and zero worth money, we must put it in context. Most importantly, we want to place it in a context that is of our own defining. This is of fundamental importance, because the dominant place of the userers has enabled them - through their high-tech network of money, markets and media - to impose their definitions upon the rest of humankind. We think of the problem, and the solution in predefined terms that are not of our own choosing. If we continue to remain within their sphere of meaning we will be trapped, unable to make any changes. The first steps that must be taken towards change and freedom are steps of defining.
If we view the phenomenon of usury from a historical perspective, in a long shot, so to speak, we can see that it has been limited and forbidden by every civilisation that valued the higher human qualities, such as trust, justice, the pursuit of knowledge and the spiritual encounter with the Divine.
As is clearly documented in the book, Usury: The Root Cause Of Injustice Of Our Times, the legalisation of usury in Europe a mere 300 years ago has permitted the dominance of a new breed of middlemen. They have conquered the zone of the transaction, totally to the extent that now all of us are forced to buy and sell in their markets, on their terms, using their banks, their money, and their technology. Opting out is simply not permitted.
The development of centralised banking networks and the creation of money, both began and remain today, firmly in the hands of private, non-government, non-elected groups of individuals. The Bank of England, despite the implications of its name, is not run by the government. The Federal Reserve Board, a governmentish sounding name if ever there was one, is not under the control of the US government. Quite the opposite.
The nation state have relinquished power to the supra-national monetarist elite, who now, almost overtly, dictate domestic policy. The nation state has become a control-zone within which a particular type of ID card and a particular paper money must be used. They have no power of their own. Their leaders are recruited and trained by the monetarists to carry out their policies, under the camouflage of the democratic process. Opposition to monetarist policy is seen as a head-on confrontation with the state, and is either absorbed into the pro/anti dialectical framework or it is discreetly removed. The dialectic is the defense mechanism of the userers, and the democratic process their trojan horse.
Britain is a classic example. Mrs. Thatcher, in true corporate raider style, has stripped the assets of the nation and sold them to the highest bidder, but who benefits? Certainly not the average citizen who is struggling for survival under the burden of ever-increasing debt. When Mr. Lawson, now no doubt destined for even greater things within the corporate sector, when he said recently that no one was happy to see higher interest rates, he ommited to add 'except the money-lenders.'
Once all business have to compete with the price of money, and the gravitational pull towards gigantism, it is inevitable that the small family business has llittle or no chance of survival. Short people drown first in a rising tide. The individual, alone with his own debts and anxieties, facing the might of corporate power, is unlikely to dare to step out of line.
When Mr. Sid Average comes back from the bank, happy that he too is now an stock-owner, and he can share in the wealth of this great nation, he is unlikely to be aware that, comes tomorrow or the day after, his bank, his mortgage company, his employer, his gas, his electricity and water suppliers, the newspaper and TV companies may all be controlled by the same group of people. It is not a conspiracy, it is just the way it is. Once a corporation is on the open market, where all are free to compete equally and the highest bidder wins, the winner is likely to be the one with the biggest bank roll. If one group is allowed to print money at will, and lend it at interest, they are likely to have the biggest roll. Lives are bought and sold in our free society.
We now find ourselves completely absorbed into the technological project, which has become the dominant global activity. Everything becomes an available resource to be used to further the project. Sustaining the economic structure becomes of paramount importance, as if everything and everyone depends on it for their survival. Everything is judged in terms of efficiency and cost-effectiveness, if you cannot measure it or add it up, then forget it. Quality itself has no value, unless it means you can charge more because of it.
And what about our humanity, and those things that give our lives meaning? Once we are subsumed under the dominant technological project, we become just another available resource. We are redefined. We are consumers, borrowers, mortgage payers (incorrectly called house owners), components of a market sector, just another part of the production and consumption process.
If we are serious about making changes, then we must look deeply into the causes of our predicament, and be prepared to act in accordance with what we find, for the current status quo is fuelled by our passivity.
Somewhere along the way we have relinquished responsibility for our own lives, for our being here. If we do not take our lives into our own hands, then we will have no one to blame but ourselves.
Hijacked Belief
And so what shall we do, and where do we begin?
If we consider medical analogy at this point it may shed some light on our situation. Imagine someone with a complicated array of physical symptoms that refuse to respond to treatment, and continually deteriorate.
Rather than opting for more surgery and wonder drugs, one may find that on close inspection this person follows a set of behaviour patterns that are clearly aggravating, or even causing the problem. He may live on a diet of junk food, alcohol and cigarettes. He may take no exercise and spend two hours each day driving in rush hour traffic. He may well be so short of vital nutrients and so full of toxin that his body cannot be other than a manifestation of that imbalance. On top of all this he may be in the middle of a breakdown of his marriage, and have a job that he hates but dares not quit.
Delving deeper, we may find that he is not in any way believe that his actions are of any consequence, so why should he change. He does not much like himself or his wife, so why bother.
Clearly, until this person changes his behaviour, his health will not improve, and until he changes his attitude and his basic beliefs, he will not be capable of changing his behaviour.
We can see that the events that surrounded the legislation of usury in England in the late 17th century were actually a manifestation of a shift in people's basic beliefs. The generally accepted definitions of human being, and his place and function in existence went through fundamental changes that are still current today, and indeed underpin every aspect of modern life.
If you dissolve the universal contract between the Creator and the created, and declare man the master of the universe, you open the door to all manner of corruption and imbalance. Man's inner being and his higher nature are then denied any reality, and will in any case be smothered in the scramble to get what you can, fuelled by the underlying anxiety out there, get a job, make some money. BE somebody.
While no one is suggesting that we go back to the worldview of 17th century England, we would do well to listen to the voices who warned of what was to come. Throughout the following decades and centuries, we can consistently hear voices warning that if we do not change our
fundamental ideas about what life is all abouit, we will be heading for disaster - in this world, never mind the next.
Belief, that most fundamental of all human qualities, was hijacked, and deflected onto the fantasy wealth, and as it settled on the unkept paper promises, it gave reality and value to illusion. And so of course the illusion worked. Everyone believed it.
In The Ten Symphonies of Gorka Konig by Ian Dallas, one of the characters says, 'As long as you think money is real, you will be an obedient slave. Once you grasp that it is worthless you recognise poverty in the fantasy money system, and at the same time real wealth in the world's natural resources, the greatest of which is man and woman.'
We must re-evaluate our possibilities and realise our potential.
In practical terms this means, quite simply, meeting, studying, discussing, de-programming, encouraging one another to fulfill our highest possibilities, for this is the antidote to the drugged sleepwalk that passes for modern life. Above all it means believing that we can and do make a difference.
The Power of the Butterfly
Reductionist scientific thinking has attempted to shrink life into a set of linear equations and cashflow charts. Thankfully life is NOT linear, so it cannot be done, and while their experiments may work on paper and on the screen, you get a different set of results when things are played out in real life. Hence that current disaster scenario.
Rational scientific thinking has actually brought itself out of a job, because, forced to accept that life is a nonlinear event, and attempting to express probabilities in nonlinear equations, they have found that nothing can actually be predicted at all, except perhaps the limits of prediction. An expression of this is the statement by the proponents of the Chaos theory that a butterfly fluttering its wings on one side of the earth could cause a hurricane on the other.
So we do not know what effect we are having by our apparently insignificant meetings and publications. We cannot measure it. What has been clearly shown is that the outcome of an event is affected by the aspirations of the participants. We must believe that success is ours for the taking. Why should it not be?
We are confronting people whose weakness is the very thing that they believe gives them power. They think that they are in charge of existence, that they can conquer it, tame it, and make profit out of it.
They do not believe that they will ever face a reckoning for their actions. And they are wrong.
This is usurious thinking, for this attitude causes the build-up of an ever-increasing debt that like toxic waste, does not just disappear simply because you bury it, or export it, or ignore it. The accumulated debts of injustice are waiting to be collected.
And like a counter balance, the world is waiting for people who are prepared to fulfill their truly human potential as guardians of the earth and its inhabitants, of life itself, people who uphold the right and forbid the wrong. This is not achieved by direct opposition to usurious system and its masters, for they are strengthened by opposition. It gives them a reality. Like the classic piece of sixties graffiti said, 'Don't vote, it only encourages them.' Their fantasy strength is reinforced by opposition to it. Like the phantom in a nightmare, it will only vanish if it is ignored. The more you attack it, the bigger it gets.
This tyrannical system will be over come by people who turn away from it - not by dropping out - but by declaring it a fantasy, and saying, with certainty, 'That is false, Reality is with us.' The capacity of people to transform themselves and their lives is the very thing that will conquer. If we refuse to be owned slaves, then we must be different Affirm the real, for when the REAL comes, the false must vanish.
People who are bound together with the true human companionship that comes from undertaking a journey or a task or a commitment that, even though it might appear too awesome to bear, is in fact the only available option - these people carry with them the seed of life that is unstoppable.
To do otherwise is to resign oneself to a life of unfulfilled potential and to being at best, mediocre. The more we meet, and discuss, and learn from each other, and share life, celebrate life, the more our members will grow and possibilities will open up, possibilities that we cannot know of or imagine, until we take the step.
I can do no better than to end with the words of Goethe, that visionary poet, opponent of usury and protector of humanity.
'Until there is commitment, there is hesistancy, the chance to draw back, always ineffectiveness. Concerning all acts of initiative and creation, there is one elementary truth the ignorance of which kills countless ideas and splendid plans: that the moment one commits oneself, the Providence moves too. All sorts of things occur to help one that would never otherwise have occured. A whole stream of events issues forth from the decision, raising in one's favour all manner of unforseen incidents and meetings and material assistance which no man could have dreamed would have come his way.'
'Whatever you can do, or dream you can do, begin it. Boldness has genius, power and magic in it. Begin it now.'
This is not an economic issue, it is a human one.
PAID - People Against Interest-Debt
MALAYSIA
PAID Network
120 Armenian Street
10200 Penang
Fax: 604 - 228 2487
Thursday, July 2, 2009
DAP merajuk kerana babi ???
Kebetulan pemimpin Pakatan Rakyat kini gemar membodohkan diri sendiri dengan isu2 yang remeh temeh.
Setelah PAS memperlekeh diri sendiri apabila mengambarkan diri mereka mabuk kuasa dengan kenyataan Unity Gomen dengan UMNO, kini DAP pula pelekehkan diri sendiri dengan kenyataan hendak tarik diri dari kerajaan Pakatan Rakyat di Kedah atas alasan "babi" yang di anggap keyataan membabi buta pula.
Apakah babi lebeh mustahak dari perpaduan mandat rakyat /manusia ???
Apakah mandat babi lebeh penting ???
Tidakkah takut adan selesema babi yang kini membunoh ramai manusia ???
Apakah isu babi lebeh mustahak dari kesehatan manusia???
Lagi pun mengikut Democracy, keputusan majority mesti di terima oleh yang minority.
Singapore, negeri Cina pun tak beri rakyat dia bela babi.!!!
DAP jangan menjadi budak bodoh ,merajuk kerana isu babi !!!
Demi perpaduan Pakatan Rakyat .perkara remeh temeh tidak perlu di bangkitkan.
Saudara Anwar pula beri keyataan perihal Chin Peng pula,Perkara remeh temeh itu mencemar kemajuan dan kepintaran sesaorang pemimpin itu.
Cobalah Pakatan Rakyat berbahas dulu sebelum berbuat keyataan kapada media. Berbalah kerana sebab yang remeh temeh akan pelekehkan pemimpin Pakatan Rakyat itu sendiri.
Pemimpin2 Pakatan Rakyat cubalah jangan ambil keputusan "unilateral" ataupun , "ikut suka /pandai aku".
Jika betul pandai tidak menjadi masaalah, tetapi kini menjadi ibarat meludah ka langit sahaja.
Coba lah fikir kehadapan(long term Planing). Coba lah jangan berfikiran pendek(short term planing)
Setelah PAS memperlekeh diri sendiri apabila mengambarkan diri mereka mabuk kuasa dengan kenyataan Unity Gomen dengan UMNO, kini DAP pula pelekehkan diri sendiri dengan kenyataan hendak tarik diri dari kerajaan Pakatan Rakyat di Kedah atas alasan "babi" yang di anggap keyataan membabi buta pula.
Apakah babi lebeh mustahak dari perpaduan mandat rakyat /manusia ???
Apakah mandat babi lebeh penting ???
Tidakkah takut adan selesema babi yang kini membunoh ramai manusia ???
Apakah isu babi lebeh mustahak dari kesehatan manusia???
Lagi pun mengikut Democracy, keputusan majority mesti di terima oleh yang minority.
Singapore, negeri Cina pun tak beri rakyat dia bela babi.!!!
DAP jangan menjadi budak bodoh ,merajuk kerana isu babi !!!
Demi perpaduan Pakatan Rakyat .perkara remeh temeh tidak perlu di bangkitkan.
Saudara Anwar pula beri keyataan perihal Chin Peng pula,Perkara remeh temeh itu mencemar kemajuan dan kepintaran sesaorang pemimpin itu.
Cobalah Pakatan Rakyat berbahas dulu sebelum berbuat keyataan kapada media. Berbalah kerana sebab yang remeh temeh akan pelekehkan pemimpin Pakatan Rakyat itu sendiri.
Pemimpin2 Pakatan Rakyat cubalah jangan ambil keputusan "unilateral" ataupun , "ikut suka /pandai aku".
Jika betul pandai tidak menjadi masaalah, tetapi kini menjadi ibarat meludah ka langit sahaja.
Coba lah fikir kehadapan(long term Planing). Coba lah jangan berfikiran pendek(short term planing)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)